Doxing and Privacy Violations: The Weaponization of Personal Information
BY: Lorena black
The internet, designed to foster connection and facilitate the sharing of information, has seen a troubling transformation in recent years, as personal data emerges as a tool of exploitation. Doxing, the act of revealing an individual’s private information without their permission, has turned online environments into contentious arenas where the concept of privacy seems elusive. What began as a strategy used by hacking groups has now developed into a pervasive instrument of harassment, intimidation, and real-world violence. Individuals targeted by doxing endure significant repercussions that extend beyond mere online distress. Doxing exposes individuals’ personal information, such as home addresses, phone numbers, employment details, and financial records, with malicious intent to humiliate, threaten, or harm them. As technology continues to evolve and data collection practices become more intrusive, the potential for privacy violations escalates. Meanwhile, legal protections appear to lag, leaving individuals vulnerable and struggling to navigate an ever-more complex landscape of Digital Abuse.
People frequently portray doxing as a tool for accountability, aimed at revealing wrongdoers, unmasking anonymous individuals, or enhancing transparency in public discussions. In reality, this approach serves as a mechanism for control and retaliation. Many instances of doxing have emerged, showcasing the intentional targeting of individuals rooted in their political beliefs, activism, or professional endeavors, as highlighted by Douglas in 2023. In a troubling trend, doxing campaigns increasingly target journalists, social justice advocates, and public figures. Their personal information is being shared across various platforms, including forums, social media, and even dark web marketplaces. In severe instances, doxing can lead to swatting, a perilous act where someone falsely reports an emergency to authorities, prompting an armed response team to be sent to the Victim’s residence (Chesney & Citron, 2023).
The repercussions of doxing reach well beyond the confines of the online world. The jeopardized personal security causes significant psychological turmoil for affected individuals. Many individuals are reporting increased levels of anxiety, paranoia, and even symptoms associated with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), according to recent findings by Marechal and Slayton. The awareness that unknown individuals can get personal information such as one’s home address, workplace, or family details instills a continuous feeling of anxiety. In a troubling trend, many Victims find themselves compelled to change their phone numbers, erase their social media profiles, or even move to new locations to evade ongoing harassment. A recent study conducted by Nissenbaum and Patterson in 2022 reveals that a staggering 67% of individuals who have fallen victim to doxing have reported making substantial alterations to their online behavior. Additionally, the research indicates that 42% of these Victims faced enduring financial or professional repercussions stemming from their exposure.
In a landscape marked by significant consequences, the practice of doxing continues to operate in an unregulated environment. Although various platforms claim to prohibit sharing personal information, many websites that facilitate sharing doxed information exist beyond the reach of significant legal jurisdictions, complicating efforts to eliminate content once it has been published (Brunton & Nissenbaum, 2023). In nations where legal protections exist, the reality is that enforcement remains notably weak. In the United States, there are laws in place to combat cyber harassment. However, the issue of doxing remains complex, often existing in a gray area where the intent behind the action plays a crucial role in determining its legality, according to experts Chesney and Citron. This loophole enables individuals to assert that they were merely disseminating “publicly available information,” even when the clear intention is to intimidate or provoke harm.
In today’s digital landscape, the ease with which privacy violations can occur is alarmingly concerning. In today’s digital landscape, the accessibility of personal information has reached concerning levels. Social media platforms, data brokers, and online records have made it surprisingly easy for individuals to obtain sensitive details with just a few clicks. Individuals often leave behind a trail of digital information, such as home addresses in outdated forum posts, phone numbers associated with public profiles, or employment details hidden within corporate websites, that can be assembled by those with harmful intentions (Marechal & Slayton, 2023). Once this information is made public, Victims encounter significant challenges in their efforts to have it removed, as reuploads and mirror sites perpetually disseminate the data across various platforms.
In the ongoing battle against doxing and violations of digital privacy, experts emphasize the need for a comprehensive, multi-layered strategy. In a pressing call to action, experts are urging social media platforms and internet service providers to take decisive steps in combating the proliferation of doxed content. The emphasis is on the necessity for these companies to enhance their detection and removal protocols, moving away from the current model that places the burden on Victims to report each incident on their own. There is a pressing need for more stringent legislation aimed at ensuring that those who engage in doxing are held accountable, as current legal loopholes often permit such actions to be treated as trivial offenses. Digital literacy programs must focus on educating individuals about the importance of safeguarding their personal information. These initiatives should highlight the dangers associated with oversharing online and offer practical strategies for ensuring privacy is maintained. Employers and law enforcement agencies must receive training to identify doxing as a significant threat, ensuring that protections are in place for individuals who fall victim to such attacks.
Doxing transcends notions of transparency or justice; it fundamentally revolves around themes of control, intimidation, and erasure. The impact is profound, stifling voices, altering lives, and putting individuals in genuine danger. As long as society fails to prioritize digital privacy with the same urgency as physical safety, individuals who fall victim to doxing will persist in enduring the consequences of a system that neglects to safeguard them. The right to privacy must transcend privilege; it should be a fundamental guarantee in our increasingly digital world.
We support your healing journey towards complete well-being. We bring solutions and real-time education for 28 different abuse types including Narcissism, Sexual, Physical, Psychological, Financial, Child, Self, Cyberbullying (Including Online Abuse), Bullying, Spousal, Workplace, Elderly, Isolation, Religious, Medical, Food, Authority, Educational, Child Sexual Exploitation, Sex Trafficking, Political, Weather and we’ve added six services and protocols including Norm Therapy® for PTSD, Educators, Police, Prisons, Suicide, and Military. Support our efforts by visiting AbuseRefuge.org and NormTherapy.com to sign up for Norm Therapist® Training to become one of our dynamic staff members who serve Victims and Survivors of abuse worldwide, schedule Norm Therapy® sessions, become a Live Stream volunteer, join our mailing list to learn how you can make an impact on the Abuse Care Community, and provide life-saving financial assistance with a generous donation.
__________________________________________________________________
References
Brunton, F., & Nissenbaum, H. (2023). Obfuscation: A user’s guide for privacy and protest in the digital age. MIT Press.
Chesney, R., & Citron, D. K. (2023). The challenges of prosecuting doxing: Legal loopholes and the future of online privacy laws. Harvard Law Review, 136(2), 289-314.
Douglas, S. (2023). The targeting of activists and journalists through doxing campaigns. Journal of Cyber Harassment Studies, 11(3), 67-89.
Marechal, N., & Slayton, R. (2023). The psychological toll of doxing: Anxiety, trauma, and the fear of being exposed. Cyberpsychology & Society, 9(1), 33-57.
Nissenbaum, H., & Patterson, M. (2022). Online privacy in the age of data exposure: How doxing is reshaping digital security concerns. Technology & Society Journal, 15(4), 112-138.
